Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Adams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Adams

729 So. 2d 481, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3439, 1999 WL 156094

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 1999

DocketNo. 98-4124

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 729 So. 2d 481 (Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Adams, 729 So. 2d 481, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3439, 1999 WL 156094 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield seeks certiorari review of an order compelling production. We find merit with Petitioner’s argument that the trial court’s order does not comply with section 624.155(4), Florida Statutes (1997). Accordingly, we remand the case for the trial court to consider the appropriate amount of costs to be posted with regard to the discovery ordered.

We decline to address Petitioner’s confidentiality-based argument, as in her response to the petition, Respondent has agreed to redact the identifying information [482]*482of individual insureds who are not parties to the present litigation.

STONE, C.J., DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield seeks certiorari review of an order compelling production. We find merit with Petitioner’s argument that the trial court’s order does not comply with section 624.155(4), Florida Statutes (1997). Accordingly, we remand the case for the trial court to consider the appropriate amount of costs to be posted with regard to the discovery ordered.

We decline to address Petitioner’s confidentiality-based argument, as in her response to the petition, Respondent has agreed to redact the identifying information [482]*482of individual insureds who are not parties to the present litigation.

STONE, C.J., DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

729 So. 2d 481, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3439, 1999 WL 156094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-blue-cross-blue-shield-v-adams-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack