Emory v. Smith

51 Ga. 323
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 Ga. 323 (Emory v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emory v. Smith, 51 Ga. 323 (Ga. 1874).

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

Under the uniform rulings in this state, an illegality does not lie on the ground that there is error in the judgment. Not, at least, unless the judgment be void. Here the most that can be said is that the judgment was irregular. Such a judgment was possible under our law, under the, writ. There" was no error therefore in overruling the illegality. This proceeding is a statutory one, and only in special cases, to-wit: when the execution is proceeding illegally. If it conforms to the judgment it is not proceeding illegally, except, perhaps, when the judgment is absolutely void. We do not say the party has no remedy. If the facts are true, as stated, this can hardly be so. We leave this, however, to the party’s own discretion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brantley v. Greer
71 Ga. 11 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Ga. 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emory-v-smith-ga-1874.