Emory University v. Shadburn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Emory University v. Shadburn

180 S.E. 137, 180 Ga. 595, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 498

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 17, 1935

DocketNo. 10016

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 180 S.E. 137 (Emory University v. Shadburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emory University v. Shadburn, 180 S.E. 137, 180 Ga. 595, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 498 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

On December 12, 1934, this court rendered an opinion affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeals, as follows: “After careful consideration of the decision and judgment of the Court of Appeals, in the light of the record and assignments of error, this court is of the opinion that the case was correctly decided by that court.” Thereafter the plaintiff in error made a motion for rehearing; and on February 18, 1935,.an order was entered vacating the judgment of affirmance and calling for additional briefs. The case is therefore now before the court for decision de novo. After considering the additional briefs we are of the opinion that the above-quoted decision is correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

On December 12, 1934, this court rendered an opinion affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeals, as follows: “After careful consideration of the decision and judgment of the Court of Appeals, in the light of the record and assignments of error, this court is of the opinion that the case was correctly decided by that court.” Thereafter the plaintiff in error made a motion for rehearing; and on February 18, 1935,.an order was entered vacating the judgment of affirmance and calling for additional briefs. The case is therefore now before the court for decision de novo. After considering the additional briefs we are of the opinion that the above-quoted decision is correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., who dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.E. 137, 180 Ga. 595, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emory-university-v-shadburn-ga-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack