Emory Bowens v. Clarence Jones, Sheriff, Dallas County, Texas

445 F.2d 851
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 1971
Docket71-1382
StatusPublished

This text of 445 F.2d 851 (Emory Bowens v. Clarence Jones, Sheriff, Dallas County, Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emory Bowens v. Clarence Jones, Sheriff, Dallas County, Texas, 445 F.2d 851 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, Emory Bowens, was convicted of a second offense for driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. He was sentenced to imprisonment for 180 days and to pay a fine of $250. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, Bowens v. State, 441 S.W.2d 529.

The complaint in habeas corpus is that the conviction was so devoid of evi-dentiary support as to violate due process of law.

The Texas Courts and the United States District Court have found and held to the contrary. That result is amply supported by the record.

The judgment denying the writ is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowens v. State
441 S.W.2d 529 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 F.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emory-bowens-v-clarence-jones-sheriff-dallas-county-texas-ca5-1971.