Emory A. Turner, Administrator, Estate of Zellie Brown, Deceased v. Edward L. Early, Administrator D.B.N., Estate of Francis Brown, Deceased

D.C. Circuit

Emory A. Turner, Administrator, Estate of Zellie Brown, Deceased v. Edward L. Early, Administrator D.B.N., Estate of Francis Brown, Deceased

301 F.2d 557

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 25, 1962

Docket16755_1

StatusPublished

This text of 301 F.2d 557 (Emory A. Turner, Administrator, Estate of Zellie Brown, Deceased v. Edward L. Early, Administrator D.B.N., Estate of Francis Brown, Deceased) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emory A. Turner, Administrator, Estate of Zellie Brown, Deceased v. Edward L. Early, Administrator D.B.N., Estate of Francis Brown, Deceased, 301 F.2d 557 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant brought suit seeking to have a certain savings account declared to be the property of his deceased mother’s estate. The District Court, after hearing evidence without a jury, made findings of fact and conclusions of law adverse to plaintiff-appellant, and judgment was entered accordingly.

In reviewing the record on this appeal, we are satisfied that the findings of fact made by the District Court, Judge Matthews sitting, are not clearly erroneous and that therefore appellee’s reliance upon Rule 52(a) Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. is justified. The conclusions of law properly followed from the findings of fact. The ensuing judgment for appellee accordingly is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant brought suit seeking to have a certain savings account declared to be the property of his deceased mother’s estate. The District Court, after hearing evidence without a jury, made findings of fact and conclusions of law adverse to plaintiff-appellant, and judgment was entered accordingly.

In reviewing the record on this appeal, we are satisfied that the findings of fact made by the District Court, Judge Matthews sitting, are not clearly erroneous and that therefore appellee’s reliance upon Rule 52(a) Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. is justified. The conclusions of law properly followed from the findings of fact. The ensuing judgment for appellee accordingly is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 F.2d 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emory-a-turner-administrator-estate-of-zellie-brown-deceased-v-edward-cadc-1962.