Emmons v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad

38 Ind. 247
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Ind. 247 (Emmons v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emmons v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad, 38 Ind. 247 (Ind. 1871).

Opinion

Worden, C. J.

The questions involved in this case are the same as in the case of Straughan v. The Indianapolis and St. Louis Railroad Company, ante, p. 185; and for the reasons given in that case, the judgment must be affirmed.

W. A. McKenzie, for appellant' M. A. Osborn and L. Ritter, for appellee.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs and five per cent, damages.

Pettit, J., was absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Ind. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmons-v-indianapolis-st-louis-railroad-ind-1871.