Emmons v. Courtenay

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Emmons v. Courtenay

66 Pa. Super. 35, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 185

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 13, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 174

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 Pa. Super. 35 (Emmons v. Courtenay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emmons v. Courtenay, 66 Pa. Super. 35, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 185 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Only disputed questions of fact are involved in this appeal. The case was tried by a judge of the Municipal Court without a jury, and resulted in a finding in favor of the plaintiff. No authority is cited by the appellant, suggesting an error on any question of law involved on the trial. The opinion of Judge Knowles is fully sustained by an examination of the testimony, and for the reasons he gives, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Only disputed questions of fact are involved in this appeal. The case was tried by a judge of the Municipal Court without a jury, and resulted in a finding in favor of the plaintiff. No authority is cited by the appellant, suggesting an error on any question of law involved on the trial. The opinion of Judge Knowles is fully sustained by an examination of the testimony, and for the reasons he gives, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 Pa. Super. 35, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmons-v-courtenay-pasuperct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack