Emmons v. Courtenay

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Emmons v. Courtenay

66 Pa. Super. 35, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 185

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 13, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 174·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Only disputed questions of fact are involved in this appeal. The case was tried by a judge of the Municipal Court without a jury, and resulted in a finding in favor of the plaintiff. No authority is cited by the appellant, suggesting an error on any question of law involved on the trial. The opinion of Judge Knowles is fully sustained by an examination of the testimony, and for the reasons he gives, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Only disputed questions of fact are involved in this appeal. The case was tried by a judge of the Municipal Court without a jury, and resulted in a finding in favor of the plaintiff. No authority is cited by the appellant, suggesting an error on any question of law involved on the trial. The opinion of Judge Knowles is fully sustained by an examination of the testimony, and for the reasons he gives, the judgment is affirmed.

Emmons v. Courtenay, 66 Pa. Super. 35, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 185 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

66 Pa. Super. 35 (Emmons v. Courtenay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related