EMMITT HARVEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of EMMITT HARVEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (EMMITT HARVEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
EMMITT HARVEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D22-737
[June 16, 2022]
Appeal from order denying rule 3.800 motion in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432015CF000421, 432015CF000417, 432015CF000419, and 432015CF000287.
Emmitt Harvey, Indiantown, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EMMITT HARVEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmitt-harvey-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.