Emmette J. Stebbins v. Harris Ellsworth
This text of 249 F.2d 506 (Emmette J. Stebbins v. Harris Ellsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
249 F.2d 506
101 U.S.App.D.C. 414
Emmette J. STEBBINS, Appellant,
v.
Harris ELLSWORTH et al., Appellees.
No. 13857.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Oct. 16, 1957.
Decided Oct. 24, 1957.
Emmette Jerome Stebbins, appellant pro se.
Mr. Herbert E. Morris, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George Cochran Doub and Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Paul A. Sweeney, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by a former government employee from a summary judgment denying relief in a suit for reinstatement. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 F.2d 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmette-j-stebbins-v-harris-ellsworth-cadc-1957.