Emmett Spooner, Sr. v. Sid Gautreaux

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 2012
Docket11-30651
StatusUnpublished

This text of Emmett Spooner, Sr. v. Sid Gautreaux (Emmett Spooner, Sr. v. Sid Gautreaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emmett Spooner, Sr. v. Sid Gautreaux, (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Case: 11-30651 Document: 00511742630 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/31/2012

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED January 31, 2012 No. 11-30651 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

EMMETT SPOONER, SR.; CHERYL W. SPOONER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

SID GAUTREAUX, Sheriff; CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana No. 3:11-CV-89

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-30651 Document: 00511742630 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/31/2012

No. 11-30651

The plaintiffs, proceeding pro se in the district court and on appeal, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, attacking various transactions regarding a foreclosure. The magistrate judge issued an extensive report recommending that the district court should abstain from exercising jurisdiction and should dismiss the suit without prejudice. The district court adopted that recommendation. We agree with the magistrate judge that abstention is required by Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and Health Net, Inc. v. Wooley, 534 F.3d 487 (5th Cir. 2008). The judgment of dismissal without prejudice is AFFIRMED, essen- tially for the reasons given by the magistrate judge in her report. The motion for leave to file a supplemental brief and to provide additional evidence is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Health Net, Inc. v. Wooley
534 F.3d 487 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Younger v. Harris
401 U.S. 37 (Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Emmett Spooner, Sr. v. Sid Gautreaux, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmett-spooner-sr-v-sid-gautreaux-ca5-2012.