Emmet Walter Wendt v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Emmet Walter Wendt v. United States

394 F.2d 627

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 26, 1968

Docket21564

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 394 F.2d 627 (Emmet Walter Wendt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emmet Walter Wendt v. United States, 394 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, under 18 U.S.C. § 641, which charged appellant with knowingly receiving and selling government property, in thiee counts, and a conspiracy, under 18 U.S.C. § 371, to commit such offenses.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to the government, as we must on this appeal, the evidence produced in the trial court, though largely circumstantial, is clearly sufficient to raise the question of appellant’s guilt, decided adversely by the jury to appellant’s position.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, under 18 U.S.C. § 641, which charged appellant with knowingly receiving and selling government property, in thiee counts, and a conspiracy, under 18 U.S.C. § 371, to commit such offenses.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to the government, as we must on this appeal, the evidence produced in the trial court, though largely circumstantial, is clearly sufficient to raise the question of appellant’s guilt, decided adversely by the jury to appellant’s position.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

394 F.2d 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmet-walter-wendt-v-united-states-ca9-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack