Emmet & Co. v. Catholic Health East

114 A.D.3d 605, 980 N.Y.S.2d 762

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered December 13, 2012, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered September 25, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Plaintiffs’ status as former bondholders does not render the “no action” clauses of the indentures governing the bonds inapplicable to them (Bank of N.Y. v Battery Park City Auth., 251 [606]*606AD2d 211 [1st Dept 1998]). Nor are they excused from compliance by the indentures “principal and interest” clauses, which only authorize actions for past due principal and interest (id.). Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Saxe and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Emmet & Co. v. Catholic Health East, 114 A.D.3d 605, 980 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

114 A.D.3d 605 (Emmet & Co. v. Catholic Health East) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of New York v. Battery Park City Authority
251 A.D.2d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)