Emmet & Co. v. Catholic Health East

114 A.D.3d 605, 980 N.Y.S.2d 762

This text of 114 A.D.3d 605 (Emmet & Co. v. Catholic Health East) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emmet & Co. v. Catholic Health East, 114 A.D.3d 605, 980 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered December 13, 2012, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered September 25, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Plaintiffs’ status as former bondholders does not render the “no action” clauses of the indentures governing the bonds inapplicable to them (Bank of N.Y. v Battery Park City Auth., 251 [606]*606AD2d 211 [1st Dept 1998]). Nor are they excused from compliance by the indentures “principal and interest” clauses, which only authorize actions for past due principal and interest (id.). Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Saxe and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of New York v. Battery Park City Authority
251 A.D.2d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A.D.3d 605, 980 N.Y.S.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmet-co-v-catholic-health-east-nyappdiv-2014.