EMMANUELA BRUNO v. BHUJ 1 LLC
This text of EMMANUELA BRUNO v. BHUJ 1 LLC (EMMANUELA BRUNO v. BHUJ 1 LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 16, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-2206 Lower Tribunal No. 20-16054 ________________
Emmanuela Bruno, Appellant,
vs.
BHUJ 1 LLC, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice Butchko, Judge.
The Monestime Firm, P.A., and Regine Monestime, for appellant.
Arnaldo Velez, P.A., and Arnaldo Velez; Salina Jivani, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Appellant Emmanuela Bruno challenges several orders on
appeal. Only one is timely. In that order, Bruno challenges the trial court’s
denial of her objection to the judicial sale without an evidentiary
hearing. Based on the record before us, we reverse and remand for an
evidentiary hearing. See Arsali v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 121 So. 3d 511
(Fla. 2013).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
EMMANUELA BRUNO v. BHUJ 1 LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmanuela-bruno-v-bhuj-1-llc-fladistctapp-2022.