Emmanuel v. United States

534 U.S. 1111, 151 L. Ed. 2d 883, 122 S. Ct. 917, 70 U.S.L.W. 3463, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 509, 2002 WL 75877
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 22, 2002
DocketNo. 01-7149
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 534 U.S. 1111 (Emmanuel v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emmanuel v. United States, 534 U.S. 1111, 151 L. Ed. 2d 883, 122 S. Ct. 917, 70 U.S.L.W. 3463, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 509, 2002 WL 75877 (2002).

Opinion

C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until February 12,2002, [1112]*1112within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 88(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. McDonald's Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois, 2004
Yellow Transportation, Inc v. State of Michigan (On Remand)
669 N.W.2d 553 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2003)
Shenango Incorporated v. Apfel
307 F.3d 174 (Third Circuit, 2002)
Shenango Inc v. Comm Social Security
307 F.3d 174 (Third Circuit, 2002)
Moskowitz v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.
768 N.E.2d 262 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2002)
State v. Liefert
2002 MT 48 (Montana Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 U.S. 1111, 151 L. Ed. 2d 883, 122 S. Ct. 917, 70 U.S.L.W. 3463, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 509, 2002 WL 75877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmanuel-v-united-states-scotus-2002.