Emmanuel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Emmanuel v. State

844 So. 2d 807, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7070, 2003 WL 21076277

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 14, 2003

DocketNo. 4D01-348

StatusPublished

This text of 844 So. 2d 807 (Emmanuel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emmanuel v. State, 844 So. 2d 807, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7070, 2003 WL 21076277 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s, Thomas Emmanuel, conviction on the charge of impregnating a child under the age of sixteen; however, we remand for resentencing. Appellee concedes, and we agree, appellant must be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines rather than the 1995 sentencing guidelines with a corrected sc.oresheet as argued by appellee.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s, Thomas Emmanuel, conviction on the charge of impregnating a child under the age of sixteen; however, we remand for resentencing. Appellee concedes, and we agree, appellant must be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines rather than the 1995 sentencing guidelines with a corrected sc.oresheet as argued by appellee.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

844 So. 2d 807, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7070, 2003 WL 21076277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emmanuel-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.