Emmanual Blaz Mrkonjic-Ruzic v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Emmanual Blaz Mrkonjic-Ruzic v. United States

402 F.2d 836

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 1, 1969

Docket22108

StatusPublished

This text of 402 F.2d 836 (Emmanual Blaz Mrkonjic-Ruzic v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emmanual Blaz Mrkonjic-Ruzic v. United States, 402 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was properly charged. Conerly v. United States, 350 F.2d 679 (9th Cir. 1965).

Appellant’s answer in the negative in response to an inquiry constituted a false representation under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Tzantarmas v. United States, 402 F.2d 163 (9th Cir. 1968); Brandow v. United States, 268 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1959).

Appellant was not deprived of a fair trial by reason of the District Court’s response to provocative conduct on the part of appellant’s trial counsel.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI