Emma Ruano v. Jeremiah Akpe and Arit Akpe

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 20, 2018·No. 01-18-00756-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00756-CV ——————————— EMMA RUANO, Appellant V. JEREMIAH AKPE AND ARIT AKPE, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1097369

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Emma Ruano has neither established indigence, nor paid or made

arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1

(listing requirements for establishing indigence); TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing

dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Emma Ruano v. Jeremiah Akpe and Arit Akpe, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Emma Ruano v. Jeremiah Akpe and Arit Akpe (Emma Ruano v. Jeremiah Akpe and Arit Akpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.