Emma Ruano v. Jeremiah Akpe and Arit Akpe
Opinion
Opinion issued November 20, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00756-CV ——————————— EMMA RUANO, Appellant V. JEREMIAH AKPE AND ARIT AKPE, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1097369
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Emma Ruano has neither established indigence, nor paid or made
arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1
(listing requirements for establishing indigence); TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing
dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emma Ruano v. Jeremiah Akpe and Arit Akpe (Emma Ruano v. Jeremiah Akpe and Arit Akpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.