Emma R. Marlowe, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Richard Marlowe v. Josephine Roche

D.C. Circuit

Emma R. Marlowe, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Richard Marlowe v. Josephine Roche

289 F.2d 786, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 120, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4843

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 1961

Docket15944_1

StatusPublished

This text of 289 F.2d 786 (Emma R. Marlowe, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Richard Marlowe v. Josephine Roche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emma R. Marlowe, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Richard Marlowe v. Josephine Roche, 289 F.2d 786, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 120, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4843 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

289 F.2d 786

Emma R. MARLOWE, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Richard Marlowe, Appellant,
v.
Josephine ROCHE et al., Appellees.

No. 15944.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued January 10, 1961.

Decided April 13, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Edward M. Curran, Judge.

Mr. Warren E. Miller, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Edward L. Carey, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Val J. Mitch and Charles L. Widman, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit,* and BURGER, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Kennett v. Roche, No. 15892, D.C.Cir., Dec. 20, 1960; Kennet v. United Mine Workers, D.C.D.C.1960, 183 F.Supp. 315.

Affirmed.

Notes:

*

Sitting by designation pursuant to Sec. 294(d), Title 28 U.S.C

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI