Emlen v. Hoops
3 Serg. & Rawle 130
This text of 3 Serg. & Rawle 130 (Emlen v. Hoops) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Emlen v. Hoops, 3 Serg. & Rawle 130 (Pa. 1817).
Opinion
decided that they might be admitted as co-defendants ; but the name of Hoops, the defendant, should not be struck out, without the consent of the plaintiff, who refused his consent because the landlords, Messrs, Jacobs, wanted to use him as a witness.
Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Merritt v. Thompson
13 Ill. 716 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1852)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Serg. & Rawle 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emlen-v-hoops-pa-1817.