Emlen v. Hoops
3 Serg. & Rawle 130
Opinion
decided that they might be admitted as co-defendants ; but the name of Hoops, the defendant, should not be struck out, without the consent of the plaintiff, who refused his consent because the landlords, Messrs, Jacobs, wanted to use him as a witness.
Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emlen v. Hoops, 3 Serg. & Rawle 130 (Pa. 1817).
3 Serg. & Rawle 130 (Emlen v. Hoops) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merritt v. Thompson
13 Ill. 716 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1852)