Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Georgia

Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Bryant

4 S.E.2d 471, 188 Ga. 594, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 585

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 12, 1939

DocketNos. 12988, 12989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 S.E.2d 471 (Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Bryant, 4 S.E.2d 471, 188 Ga. 594, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 585 (Ga. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

An examination of this record disclosing that the case involves, not the constitutionality of any law of this State or of the United States, but merely the application, in a general sense, of a stated provision of the constitution of the United States to a given state of facts and to the trial of this case; and there being no other ground giving' this court jurisdiction, it follows that the same must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. Compare Gulf Paving Co. v. Atlanta, 149 Ga. 114 (99 S. E. 374); Howell v. State, 153 Ga, 201 (111 S. E. 675); Dunn Motors Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Cor., 174 Ga. 743 (163 S. E. 906); Americcm Mills Co. v. Dogal, 174 Ga. 631 (163 S. E. 603); Thompson v. State, 174 Ga. 804 (164 S. E. 202); Dennard v. State, 176 Ga. 361 (168 S. E. 310); Felker v. Still, 176 Ga. 735 (169 S. E. 15); Payne v. State, 180 Ga. 609 (180 S. E. 130); Southern Pacific Co. v. DiCristina, 36 Ga. App. 433 (137 S. E. 79); Western Union Telegraph Co. v. King, 188 Ga. 95 (2 S. E. 2d, 909).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

An examination of this record disclosing that the case involves, not the constitutionality of any law of this State or of the United States, but merely the application, in a general sense, of a stated provision of the constitution of the United States to a given state of facts and to the trial of this case; and there being no other ground giving' this court jurisdiction, it follows that the same must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. Compare Gulf Paving Co. v. Atlanta, 149 Ga. 114 (99 S. E. 374); Howell v. State, 153 Ga, 201 (111 S. E. 675); Dunn Motors Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Cor., 174 Ga. 743 (163 S. E. 906); Americcm Mills Co. v. Dogal, 174 Ga. 631 (163 S. E. 603); Thompson v. State, 174 Ga. 804 (164 S. E. 202); Dennard v. State, 176 Ga. 361 (168 S. E. 310); Felker v. Still, 176 Ga. 735 (169 S. E. 15); Payne v. State, 180 Ga. 609 (180 S. E. 130); Southern Pacific Co. v. DiCristina, 36 Ga. App. 433 (137 S. E. 79); Western Union Telegraph Co. v. King, 188 Ga. 95 (2 S. E. 2d, 909).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 S.E.2d 471, 188 Ga. 594, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eminent-household-of-columbian-woodmen-v-bryant-ga-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack