Emily Towers Owners Corp. v. Carleton Emily Towers, L.P.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Emily Towers Owners Corp. v. Carleton Emily Towers, L.P.

175 Misc. 2d 283, 669 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 666

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 175 Misc. 2d 283 (Emily Towers Owners Corp. v. Carleton Emily Towers, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emily Towers Owners Corp. v. Carleton Emily Towers, L.P., 175 Misc. 2d 283, 669 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously modified by granting defendant’s cross [284]*284motion in its entirety and. remanding the matter to the court below for determination of the reasonable value of the attorney’s fees, and, as so modified, order affirmed without costs.

The offering plan, proprietary lease and by-laws when read together evidence a clear intent to exempt the holdovers of "Unsold Shares” in the cooperative association from any increases in parking charges (see, Tompkins v Hale, 172 Misc 1071, affd 259 App Div 860, affd 284 NY 675). Defendant is therefore entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to Real Property Law § 234 (see, North Star Graphics v Spitzer, 135 AD2d 401, lv dismissed 72 NY2d 841).

Aronin, J. P., Scholnick and Patterson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI