Emily L. Foster v. Charleston County Substance Abuse Commission

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38824, 1996 WL 23353
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1996
Docket95-1306
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (Emily L. Foster v. Charleston County Substance Abuse Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emily L. Foster v. Charleston County Substance Abuse Commission, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38824, 1996 WL 23353 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Emily L. FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHARLESTON COUNTY SUBSTANCE ABUSE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1306.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Emily L. Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, Charleston, SC, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her 42 U.S.C.A. Secs. 1981, 1983 (West 1994) claims and referring her Title VII claim to the magistrate judge for additional findings. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38824, 1996 WL 23353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emily-l-foster-v-charleston-county-substance-abuse-ca4-1996.