Emily Francis v. TD Bank NA

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X Emily Francis,

Plaintiff, ORD ER A D O PTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION -against- 25-CV-5542 (RER) (LKE) TD Bank NA,

Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------X

RAMÓN E. REYES, JR., District Judge:

In a report and recommendation dated November 17, 2025, (Order dated 11/17/2025 (the “R&R”)), Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi recommended that the Court dismiss the complaint for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute her claims. (Id.) Judge Eshkenazi advised the parties that they had fourteen days from the date that R&R was received to file objections. (Id.) To date, neither party has filed an objection to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, adopts the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Therefore, it is ordered that the R&R is adopted in its entirety, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. // // // // // The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant and to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ramón E. Reyes, Jr. RAMÓN E. REYES, JR. United States District Judge

Dated: December 5, 2025 Brooklyn, New York