Emilia Velasquez-Gaspar v. Merrick Garland

Ninth Circuit

Emilia Velasquez-Gaspar v. Merrick Garland

22 F.4th 1179

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2022·No. 17-71964·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMILIA VELASQUEZ-GASPAR, No. 17-71964 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A200-903-039

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.

Filed January 25, 2022

Before: Richard A. Paez, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Lawrence J. VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMILIA VELASQUEZ-GASPAR, No. 17-71964 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A200-903-039

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.

Filed January 25, 2022

Before: Richard A. Paez, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Lawrence J. VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Emilia Velasquez-Gaspar v. Merrick Garland, 22 F.4th 1179 (9th Cir. 2022).

Pincite

22 F.4th 1179 (Emilia Velasquez-Gaspar v. Merrick Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.