Emile Schulingkamp Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 303
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 1961
DocketNo. 65047; protests 309731-K, etc. (Galveston)
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 303 (Emile Schulingkamp Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emile Schulingkamp Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 303 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) As to all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after January 1, 1948, and prior to September 10, 1955, at 20 cents per dozen articles, but not less than 7 % percent nor more than 25 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 210, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802) ; and (b) as to all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10, 1955, at 12% percent, if valued under $1.50 per dozen articles, or at 6% percent, if valued at $1.50 or more per dozen articles, under paragraph 210, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emile-schulingkamp-co-v-united-states-cusc-1961.