Emile Parker v. State of Florida
This text of Emile Parker v. State of Florida (Emile Parker v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 5, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2057 Lower Tribunal No. F12-29714 ________________
Emile Parker, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Christine Hernandez, Judge.
Emile Parker, in proper person.
John Guard, Acting Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Moore v. Pearson, 789 So. 2d 316, 319 (Fla. 2001)
(“The authority to regulate gain time resides exclusively within the
Department of Corrections pursuant to chapter 944, Florida Statutes.”);
Tribue v. State, 682 So. 2d 196, 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (“However, the
responsibility for making the determination of the actual amount of gain time
rests with the Department of Corrections. The burden falls upon the
defendant to seek credit for this time pursuant to the appropriate
administrative procedures.”) (internal citations omitted); Walker v. State, 619
So. 2d 518, 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (“The award of gain time is solely a
function of the Department of Corrections.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Emile Parker v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emile-parker-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.