Emil Kiewert Co. v. Hoyt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Emil Kiewert Co. v. Hoyt

32 N.W. 137, 68 Wis. 296, 1887 Wisc. LEXIS 97

DecidedMarch 1, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.W. 137 (Emil Kiewert Co. v. Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emil Kiewert Co. v. Hoyt, 32 N.W. 137, 68 Wis. 296, 1887 Wisc. LEXIS 97 (Wis. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Cassoday, J.

For the reasons given in the opinion filed herewith in the case of Winner v. Hoyt, ante, p. 278, we must hold that the court had jurisdiction of the property and credits in the hands of the garnishees, and that the notice given was sufficient to pi'event the service on the garnishees from becoming void and of no effect from the beginning.

By the Court.— The order of the circuit court appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cassoday, J.

For the reasons given in the opinion filed herewith in the case of Winner v. Hoyt, ante, p. 278, we must hold that the court had jurisdiction of the property and credits in the hands of the garnishees, and that the notice given was sufficient to pi'event the service on the garnishees from becoming void and of no effect from the beginning.

By the Court.— The order of the circuit court appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.W. 137, 68 Wis. 296, 1887 Wisc. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emil-kiewert-co-v-hoyt-wis-1887.