Emil Horwitz v. Food Town, Incorporated and Elmo Harelson
367 F.2d 584
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 7, 1966·No. 22979·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This was a diversity action by a real estate broker licensed under the laws of New York, but not licensed under the laws of Louisiana, for a brokerage fee. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Its opinion is reported at 241 F.Supp. 1. We are of the view that Woods v. Interstate Realty Company, 337 U.S. 535, 69 S.Ct. 1235, 93 L.Ed. 1524 (1949) is controlling and the Judgment must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emil Horwitz v. Food Town, Incorporated and Elmo Harelson, 367 F.2d 584 (5th Cir. 1966).
367 F.2d 584 (Emil Horwitz v. Food Town, Incorporated and Elmo Harelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a Corporation
802 F.2d 1143 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Dart Drug Corp. v. Corning Glass Works
480 F. Supp. 1091 (D. Maryland, 1979)