Emil Horwitz v. Food Town, Incorporated and Elmo Harelson

Fifth Circuit

Emil Horwitz v. Food Town, Incorporated and Elmo Harelson

367 F.2d 584

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1966

Docket22979

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 367 F.2d 584 (Emil Horwitz v. Food Town, Incorporated and Elmo Harelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emil Horwitz v. Food Town, Incorporated and Elmo Harelson, 367 F.2d 584 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was a diversity action by a real estate broker licensed under the laws of New York, but not licensed under the laws of Louisiana, for a brokerage fee. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Its opinion is reported at 241 F.Supp. 1. We are of the view that Woods v. Interstate Realty Company, 337 U.S. 535, 69 S.Ct. 1235, 93 L.Ed. 1524 (1949) is controlling and the Judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This was a diversity action by a real estate broker licensed under the laws of New York, but not licensed under the laws of Louisiana, for a brokerage fee. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Its opinion is reported at 241 F.Supp. 1. We are of the view that Woods v. Interstate Realty Company, 337 U.S. 535, 69 S.Ct. 1235, 93 L.Ed. 1524 (1949) is controlling and the Judgment must be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

367 F.2d 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emil-horwitz-v-food-town-incorporated-and-elmo-harelson-ca5-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack