Emil Brand v. Eastover, Inc.

First Circuit

Emil Brand v. Eastover, Inc.

295 F.2d 816, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedNovember 22, 1961

Docket5875_1

StatusPublished

This text of 295 F.2d 816 (Emil Brand v. Eastover, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emil Brand v. Eastover, Inc., 295 F.2d 816, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118 (1st Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

*817 PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action for injuries sustained while coasting at a winter resort the court in effect told the jury that if the rock which appellant testified his sled struck was where he said it was he could recover, but that if there was no rock there at all, as defendant’s witnesses testified, he could not. We think this charge was fair and appropriate.

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment and order of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*817 PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action for injuries sustained while coasting at a winter resort the court in effect told the jury that if the rock which appellant testified his sled struck was where he said it was he could recover, but that if there was no rock there at all, as defendant’s witnesses testified, he could not. We think this charge was fair and appropriate.

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment and order of the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 F.2d 816, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emil-brand-v-eastover-inc-ca1-1961.