Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Van Bokkelen

243 A.D. 805

This text of 243 A.D. 805 (Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Van Bokkelen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Van Bokkelen, 243 A.D. 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order granting, on reargument, defendant Van Bokkelen’s motion to annul a deficiency judgment in plaintiff’s favor, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The proof, in the form of affidavits submitted on behalf of the respondent on the question of the value of the premises in question, was not contradicted by the appellant, and no request was made for permission to submit affidavits or to offer oral proofs on that question. Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to reverse and remit to the Special Term for a hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emigrant-industrial-savings-bank-v-van-bokkelen-nyappdiv-1935.