Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Scott's Bridge Realty Co.
This text of 240 A.D. 779 (Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Scott's Bridge Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to direct payment of balance of deposit to the receiver reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The moneys on deposit with the trust company were deposited in that trust company pursuant to an order of the court appointing a receiver. The trust company was specifically mentioned as a depositary. The trust company, therefore, had notice of the nature of the deposit of the moneys. In our opinion, moneys deposited by a receiver of rents and profits in a foreclosure action in a bank, pursuant to direction that the moneys be deposited in that bank, are court funds, and the deposit is in the nature of a trust. By accepting the trust the bank becomes in effect a party to the action and amenable to the summary directions of the court. It appearing that the directions of Federal and State authorities affect the ordinary and usual deposits, where the relationship of debtor and creditor exists, those directions have no application here. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm; Scudder, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emigrant-industrial-savings-bank-v-scotts-bridge-realty-co-nyappdiv-1933.