Emerzian v. S. J. Kornblum & William Kornblum

3 F.2d 995, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3854
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 1925
DocketNo. 4388
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 F.2d 995 (Emerzian v. S. J. Kornblum & William Kornblum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emerzian v. S. J. Kornblum & William Kornblum, 3 F.2d 995, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3854 (9th Cir. 1925).

Opinion

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment in an action [996]*996at law tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. There was no stipulation in writing waiving a jury filed with the clerk, as required by section 649 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 1587). In the absence of such a stipulation it has been held in an almost endless line of decisions that rulings made in the progress of the trial cannot be reviewed by an appellate court, unless error appears on the face of the process, pleadings, or judgment. Duncan v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 72 F. 808, 19 C. C. A. 202; Erkel v. United States, 169 F. 623, 95 C. C. A. 151; Ladd & Tilton Bank v. Lewis A. Hicks Co., 218 F. 310, 134 C. C. A. 106; Bouldin v. Alto Mines Co. (C. C. A.) 299 F. 301; United States v. McGovern (C. C. A.) 299 F.302.

The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noone v. Sinner
24 F.2d 960 (Eighth Circuit, 1928)
Navajo County v. Mesmer
4 F.2d 821 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 F.2d 995, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emerzian-v-s-j-kornblum-william-kornblum-ca9-1925.