Emery v. Langevin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Emery v. Langevin

170 A.D. 909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D. 909 (Emery v. Langevin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emery v. Langevin, 170 A.D. 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed as to defendant Langevin, with costs, but as to defendant McGinley reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiff’s testimony, viewed most favorably to him, tended to establish all the necessary elements of an action for fraud against the defendant McGinley, and, therefore, that the complaint as to said defendant was improperly dismissed. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed as to defendant Langevin, with costs, but as to defendant McGinley reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiff’s testimony, viewed most favorably to him, tended to establish all the necessary elements of an action for fraud against the defendant McGinley, and, therefore, that the complaint as to said defendant was improperly dismissed. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emery-v-langevin-nyappdiv-1915.