Emery v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 090624d (or.tax 7-16-2009)

Oregon Tax Court

Emery v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 090624d (or.tax 7-16-2009)

DecidedJuly 16, 2009

DocketTC-MD 090624D.

StatusPublished

This text of Emery v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 090624d (or.tax 7-16-2009) (Emery v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 090624d (or.tax 7-16-2009)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emery v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 090624d (or.tax 7-16-2009), (Or. Super. Ct. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION This matter is before the court on the agreement of the parties.

On July 7, 2009, Defendant wrote to the court, stating that the parties worked together and agreed that Plaintiff Martin J. Emery is entitled to 95 percent or $578.77 of their requested 2008 state income tax refund in the amount of $609.00. Defendant sent one check in the amount of $456.75 on June 30, 2009, and will send another check in the amount of $122.01 during the week of July 6, 2009.

Plaintiffs' requested relief included a request that their filing fee of $25 be returned. Plaintiffs' request is denied. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff Martin J. Emery is entitled to 95 percent or $578.77 of the 2008 requested state income tax refund. *Page 2

IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Plaintiffs' request that their filing fee be refunded is denied.

Dated this ___ day of July 2009.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner onJuly 16, 2009. The Court filed and entered this document on July 16,2009. *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION This matter is before the court on the agreement of the parties.

On July 7, 2009, Defendant wrote to the court, stating that the parties worked together and agreed that Plaintiff Martin J. Emery is entitled to 95 percent or $578.77 of their requested 2008 state income tax refund in the amount of $609.00. Defendant sent one check in the amount of $456.75 on June 30, 2009, and will send another check in the amount of $122.01 during the week of July 6, 2009.

Plaintiffs' requested relief included a request that their filing fee of $25 be returned. Plaintiffs' request is denied. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff Martin J. Emery is entitled to 95 percent or $578.77 of the 2008 requested state income tax refund. *Page 2

IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Plaintiffs' request that their filing fee be refunded is denied.

Dated this ___ day of July 2009.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner onJuly 16, 2009. The Court filed and entered this document on July 16,2009. *Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Emery v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 090624d (or.tax 7-16-2009), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emery-v-department-of-revenue-tc-md-090624d-ortax-7-16-2009-ortc-2009.