Emerson v. State

190 S.W.2d 485, 190 S.W. 485, 80 Tex. Crim. 354, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 29, 1916
Docket4295
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 190 S.W.2d 485 (Emerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emerson v. State, 190 S.W.2d 485, 190 S.W. 485, 80 Tex. Crim. 354, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349 (Tex. 1916).

Opinions

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for unlawfully carrying a pistol and assessed the lowest punishment.

The only question is as to the sufficiency of the testimony to sustain the conviction. We have read it carefully, and we think it is sufficient. (Leonard v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 84; Mayfield v. State, 75 Texas Crim. Rep., 103, 170 S. W. Rep., 308, and cases there cited.)

The iudgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

HARPER, Judge, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Courtney v. State
424 S.W.2d 440 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
People v. Smith
164 P.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1946)
Spears v. State
17 S.W.2d 809 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
State v. Brunson
111 So. 321 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Paulk v. State
261 S.W. 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Welch v. State
262 S.W. 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.W.2d 485, 190 S.W. 485, 80 Tex. Crim. 354, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emerson-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.