Emerson v. State
This text of 190 S.W.2d 485 (Emerson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was convicted for unlawfully carrying a pistol and assessed the lowest punishment.
The only question is as to the sufficiency of the testimony to sustain the conviction. We have read it carefully, and we think it is sufficient. (Leonard v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 84; Mayfield v. State, 75 Texas Crim. Rep., 103, 170 S. W. Rep., 308, and cases there cited.)
The iudgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
HARPER, Judge, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 S.W.2d 485, 190 S.W. 485, 80 Tex. Crim. 354, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emerson-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.