Emerson v. State
190 S.W.2d 485, 190 S.W. 485, 80 Tex. Crim. 354, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349
Opinions
Appellant was convicted for unlawfully carrying a pistol and assessed the lowest punishment.
The only question is as to the sufficiency of the testimony to sustain the conviction. We have read it carefully, and we think it is sufficient. (Leonard v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 84; Mayfield v. State, 75 Texas Crim. Rep., 103, 170 S. W. Rep., 308, and cases there cited.)
The iudgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
HARPER, Judge, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emerson v. State, 190 S.W.2d 485, 190 S.W. 485, 80 Tex. Crim. 354, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349 (Tex. 1916).
190 S.W.2d 485 (Emerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Courtney v. State
424 S.W.2d 440 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
People v. Smith
164 P.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1946)
Spears v. State
17 S.W.2d 809 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
State v. Brunson
111 So. 321 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Paulk v. State
261 S.W. 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Welch v. State
262 S.W. 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)