Emerson v. Johnson RV
This text of Emerson v. Johnson RV (Emerson v. Johnson RV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 JACKIE EMERSON, CASE NO. C21-1469-JCC 10 Plaintiff, MINUTE ORDER 11 v. 12 JOHNSON RV, et al., 13 Defendants. 14
15 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. 16 Coughenour, United States District Judge: 17 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion to revise the case 18 caption (Dkt. No. 23). Plaintiff moves to amend pursuant to written consent of the adverse parties 19 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). Strict rules govern who can represent a litigant in 20 federal court. Generally, the only permissible representative is a licensed and admitted attorney. 21 See C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697-98 (9th Cir.1987). Accordingly, 22 the Court STRIKES the motion improperly signed by Brian Del Gatto on behalf of Defendant 23 Triple E. Recreational Ltd. (“Triple E”). (Dkt. No. 23.) The parties must refile the motion 24 properly signed by each party or its permissible representative. 25 // 26 // 1 DATED this 28th day of March 2022. Ravi Subramanian 2 Clerk of Court 3 s/Sandra Rawski 4 Deputy Clerk 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Emerson v. Johnson RV, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emerson-v-johnson-rv-wawd-2022.