Emerson v. Emerson
35 N.Y.S. 1106, 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 883
This text of 35 N.Y.S. 1106 (Emerson v. Emerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Emerson v. Emerson, 35 N.Y.S. 1106, 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 883 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
Even if the court could entertain this motion, our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that the discretion of the special term was not improperly exercised in refusing to allow a counsel fee to the plaintiff, to be employed in securing counsel to oppose defendant’s motion. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 N.Y.S. 1106, 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emerson-v-emerson-nysupct-1895.