Emerson v. Davis

155 A.D.2d 876
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1989
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.D.2d 876 (Emerson v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emerson v. Davis, 155 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The judgment must be vacated and a new trial granted on the sole issue of damages because the jury did not follow the court’s instructions in reporting its special verdict with respect to the full dollar amount of damages sustained by plaintiff (see, Candee v Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 221 NY 723; Trulock v Kings County Iron Foundry, 216 App Div 439, 450; Chevalier v Farrell, 58 Misc 2d 991, 992). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Provenzano, J.— negligence.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Candee v. . Pennsylvania Railroad Company
117 N.E. 1083 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Trulock v. Kings County Iron Foundry, Inc.
216 A.D. 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Chevalier v. Farrell
58 Misc. 2d 991 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.D.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emerson-v-davis-nyappdiv-1989.