Emerson v. Collamore

33 Me. 581

Opinion

Shf.fley, C. J., orally.

— Whether the evidence to show the mistake was or was not admissible, it is not now necessary to decide. If inadmissible, the title is proved to be, not in the demandant, but in Hollis Parlin, and there is nothing to show that there is not such a person in full life. If the evidence be admissible, the title was in Horace Parlin, under whom the tenants have obtained it. In neither contingency, can the demandants recover.