Emerita Medina v. Gloria Raven
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-14-00881-CV Style: Emerita Medina v Gloria Raven Date motion filed*: December 17, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for reconsideration and amended motion for extension of time Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Clerk’s record and Reporter’s record
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 22, 2014 & November 21, 2014 Number of prior extensions: 0 Current Due date: October 22, 2014 & November 21, 2014 Date Requested: February 20, 2015
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ “Appellant request[s] an additional sixty (60) days to pay the required Court fee and to file the Clerk’s and Reporter’s record[s],” because “Appellant has failed to contact counsel and provide the funds . . . .” The motion is DENIED.
Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack Panel consists of ____________________________________________ Date: December 23, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emerita Medina v. Gloria Raven (Emerita Medina v. Gloria Raven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.