Emerita Medina v. Gloria Raven

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 23, 2014·No. 01-14-00881-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00881-CV Style: Emerita Medina v Gloria Raven Date motion filed*: December 17, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for reconsideration and amended motion for extension of time Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Clerk’s record and Reporter’s record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 22, 2014 & November 21, 2014 Number of prior extensions: 0 Current Due date: October 22, 2014 & November 21, 2014 Date Requested: February 20, 2015

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ “Appellant request[s] an additional sixty (60) days to pay the required Court fee and to file the Clerk’s and Reporter’s record[s],” because “Appellant has failed to contact counsel and provide the funds . . . .” The motion is DENIED.

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack  Panel consists of ____________________________________________ Date: December 23, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Emerita Medina v. Gloria Raven, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Emerita Medina v. Gloria Raven (Emerita Medina v. Gloria Raven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.