Emerick v. Harley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Emerick v. Harley

2 Whart. 50, 1836 Pa. LEXIS 229

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 31, 1836

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Whart. 50 (Emerick v. Harley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emerick v. Harley, 2 Whart. 50, 1836 Pa. LEXIS 229 (Pa. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case cannot be distinguished from those cited ■ at the bar, in which this Court has held that a party to a note is inadmissible to prove that the note was not actually negotiated to the plaintiff in the ordinary course of such transactions. The condition of the bond given in evidence certainly proves nothing of the hind; and there is nothing else upon the record, to lay a foundation for the testimony offered. The witness was therefore properly rejected, and the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case cannot be distinguished from those cited ■ at the bar, in which this Court has held that a party to a note is inadmissible to prove that the note was not actually negotiated to the plaintiff in the ordinary course of such transactions. The condition of the bond given in evidence certainly proves nothing of the hind; and there is nothing else upon the record, to lay a foundation for the testimony offered. The witness was therefore properly rejected, and the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Whart. 50, 1836 Pa. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emerick-v-harley-pa-1836.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack