Emerald Plaza West v. Salter
466 So. 2d 1129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 730, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13088
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1985·No. No. 84-980·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Agreeing with appellant that the trial court erred in granting foreclosure of a mortgage without requiring either production of the original promissory note and assignment of mortgage or reestablishment of those documents, Telephone Utility Terminal Co. v. EMC Industries, Inc., 404 So.2d 183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); § 90.-[1130]*1130953(1), Fla.Stat. (1983), we reverse the Final Judgment of Foreclosure.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Emerald Plaza West v. Salter, 466 So. 2d 1129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 730, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13088 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
466 So. 2d 1129 (Emerald Plaza West v. Salter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guerrero v. Chase Home Finance, LLC.
83 So. 3d 970 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Pastore-Borroto Dev., Inc. v. MAREVISTA APTS., MB, INC.
596 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)