Emerald Plaza West v. Salter

466 So. 2d 1129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 730, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13088
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 1985
DocketNo. 84-980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 466 So. 2d 1129 (Emerald Plaza West v. Salter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emerald Plaza West v. Salter, 466 So. 2d 1129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 730, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13088 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Agreeing with appellant that the trial court erred in granting foreclosure of a mortgage without requiring either production of the original promissory note and assignment of mortgage or reestablishment of those documents, Telephone Utility Terminal Co. v. EMC Industries, Inc., 404 So.2d 183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); § 90.-[1130]*1130953(1), Fla.Stat. (1983), we reverse the Final Judgment of Foreclosure.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guerrero v. Chase Home Finance, LLC.
83 So. 3d 970 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Pastore-Borroto Dev., Inc. v. MAREVISTA APTS., MB, INC.
596 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 So. 2d 1129, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 730, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emerald-plaza-west-v-salter-fladistctapp-1985.