Emc Mortgage Corporation v. Friedman, No. Cv 93 54135 S (Nov. 17, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Emc Mortgage Corporation v. Friedman, No. Cv 93 54135 S (Nov. 17, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11537

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedNovember 17, 1994

DocketNo. CV 93 54135 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11537 (Emc Mortgage Corporation v. Friedman, No. Cv 93 54135 S (Nov. 17, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emc Mortgage Corporation v. Friedman, No. Cv 93 54135 S (Nov. 17, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11537 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 11538 Plaintiff has filed summary judgment motions dated August 23, 1994 and October 13, 1994 against defendant Friedman's three special defenses.

Connecticut Practice Book § 379 does not permit summary judgment against special defenses. The court has reviewed the cases cited by the plaintiff at the time of the request to take these motion on the papers, Brookfield v. Candlewood, 201 Conn. 1 and Avis v. Crown, 165 Conn. 608 and finds them inapplicable to this issue.

Further, the court agrees with the decision in Bycoski v.Gagne, No. CV 93-52555 S, J.D. of Tolland, Hammer, J. dated August 18, 1994.

Accordingly, the motions for summary judgment are denied.

Rittenband, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI