Embshoff v. Embshoff

Ohio Circuit Courts

Embshoff v. Embshoff

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 589

CourtOhio Circuit Courts

DecidedJune 5, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 589 (Embshoff v. Embshoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Embshoff v. Embshoff, 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 589 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

GIFFEN, J.

While the case of Guenther v. Jacobs, 44 Wis. 354, sustains the contention of counsel that the demurrer to the petition should have been sustained, yet the decisions in this state lead to a different conclusion.

Alimony decreed in installments may be enforced by execution. Piatt v. Piatt, 9 Ohio 37.

The adequacy of alimony decreed cannot be collaterally drawn in question especially by a stranger to the suit. Hare v. Gibson, 32 Ohio St. 33 [30 Am. Rep. 568].

The husband is not complaining, and the installments due are in legal effect a judgment, the collection of which may be enforced by an action upon the appeal bond, without first obtaining the consent of the court rendering the decree.

Judgment affirmed.

Same judgment in case No. 4715.

Swing and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI