Embshoff v. Embshoff

Hamilton Circuit Court

Embshoff v. Embshoff

12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 236, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 247

DecidedJune 5, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 236 (Embshoff v. Embshoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Embshoff v. Embshoff, 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 236, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 247 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

While the case of Guenther v. Jacobs, 44 Wis., 354, sustains the contention of counsel that the demurrer to the petition should have been sustained, yet the decisions in this state lead to a different conclusion.

Alimony decreed in installments may be enforced by execution. Piatt v. Piatt, 9 Ohio, 37.

[238]*238The adequacy of alimony decreed can not be collaterally drawn in question especially by a stranger to the suit. Hare v. Gibson, 32 O. S., 33.

The 'husband is not complaining, and the installments due are in legal effect a judgment, the collection of which may be' enforced by an action upon"the appeal bond, without first obtaining the consent of the court rendering the decree.

Judgment affirmed.

Same judgment in case No. 4715.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI