Embry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Embry v. State

835 S.W.2d 493, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1054, 1992 WL 144901

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1992·No. No. 60969·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Dwayne Embry, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the legal file and briefs of the parties and find that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find that no precedential value would be served by a full opinion, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Dwayne Embry, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the legal file and briefs of the parties and find that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find that no precedential value would be served by a full opinion, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

Embry v. State, 835 S.W.2d 493, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1054, 1992 WL 144901 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

835 S.W.2d 493 (Embry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.