Embry v. Dawson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Embry v. Dawson

225 S.E.2d 59, 137 Ga. App. 782, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2601

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 19, 1976

Docket51661

StatusPublished

This text of 225 S.E.2d 59 (Embry v. Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Embry v. Dawson, 225 S.E.2d 59, 137 Ga. App. 782, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this suit for personal injury and property damage, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted based only on the pleadings. The pleadings show that plaintiff alleged that a purported release agreement between herself and defendant was obtained by a specific act of fraud of defendant. The defendant in his answer denied the allegation of fraud and pleaded the release as an accord and satisfaction. This issue of fraud has been sufficiently raised in the complaint and defendant has failed to pierce this allegation. The court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment. Heard v. Johnson, 126 Ga. App. 222, 224 (190 SE2d 455); Wadsworth v. Norris Lake Shores Development Corp., 130 Ga. App. 732 (204 SE2d 482).

Judgment reversed.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur. Submitted January 13, 1976 Decided January 19, 1976 Rehearing denied February 25, 1976. Gilbert & Blum, Fred A. Gilbert, Fred B. Hand, Jr., for appellant. Twitty & Twitty, Frank S. Twitty, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this suit for personal injury and property damage, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted based only on the pleadings. The pleadings show that plaintiff alleged that a purported release agreement between herself and defendant was obtained by a specific act of fraud of defendant. The defendant in his answer denied the allegation of fraud and pleaded the release as an accord and satisfaction. This issue of fraud has been sufficiently raised in the complaint and defendant has failed to pierce this allegation. The court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment. Heard v. Johnson, 126 Ga. App. 222, 224 (190 SE2d 455); Wadsworth v. Norris Lake Shores Development Corp., 130 Ga. App. 732 (204 SE2d 482).

Judgment reversed.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur. Submitted January 13, 1976 Decided January 19, 1976 Rehearing denied February 25, 1976. Gilbert & Blum, Fred A. Gilbert, Fred B. Hand, Jr., for appellant. Twitty & Twitty, Frank S. Twitty, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.E.2d 59, 137 Ga. App. 782, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/embry-v-dawson-gactapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack