Embry Riddle Co. v. Carrodus
207 So. 2d 472
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1968
DocketNo. 67-340
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 207 So. 2d 472 (Embry Riddle Co. v. Carrodus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Embry Riddle Co. v. Carrodus, 207 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).
Opinion
Affirmed upon the authority of the rule that contributory negligence is, where there is room for a reasonable doubt, a matter for jury determination. See City of Jacksonville v. Stokes, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 278; Miami Coin-O-Wash, Inc. v. McGough, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 227.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Barnes
342 So. 2d 100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
James J. Dvorak v. Holiday Inns of America, Inc.
429 F.2d 54 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Hamilton v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.
207 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
207 So. 2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/embry-riddle-co-v-carrodus-fladistctapp-1968.