Embry Riddle Co. v. Carrodus
207 So. 2d 472
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 1968·No. No. 67-340·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Affirmed upon the authority of the rule that contributory negligence is, where there is room for a reasonable doubt, a matter for jury determination. See City of Jacksonville v. Stokes, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 278; Miami Coin-O-Wash, Inc. v. McGough, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 227.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Embry Riddle Co. v. Carrodus, 207 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).
207 So. 2d 472 (Embry Riddle Co. v. Carrodus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Barnes
342 So. 2d 100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
James J. Dvorak v. Holiday Inns of America, Inc.
429 F.2d 54 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Hamilton v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.
207 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)