Embra v. Silliman

1 Root 128
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1789
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Root 128 (Embra v. Silliman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Embra v. Silliman, 1 Root 128 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).

Opinion

Judgment — Plea insufficient. The defendant cannot complain that he has not been attached. Legal notice is all that is necessary for the purpose of trial, and this was given him. See Seers v. Blakesly, ante.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Copes v. Malacarne
172 A. 89 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/embra-v-silliman-connsuperct-1789.