Ember Communications, Inc. v. Bijoux Terner, Inc.

561 So. 2d 1196, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1028, 1990 WL 15255
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2131
StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 1196 (Ember Communications, Inc. v. Bijoux Terner, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ember Communications, Inc. v. Bijoux Terner, Inc., 561 So. 2d 1196, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1028, 1990 WL 15255 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon Bijoux Terner, Inc.’s proper confession of error, the nonfinal orders granting Bijoux Terner a temporary injunction and denying Ember Communications, Inc., and Joseph Elad’s motion to dissolve the injunction are reversed. Because Bijoux Terner has an adequate remedy at law in the form of money damages, the trial court’s entry of the injunction was improper. Lopez-Ortiz v. Centrust Savings Bank, 546 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Reversed and remanded with directions to enter an order dissolving the injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lopez-Ortiz v. Centrust Savings Bank
546 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 1196, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1028, 1990 WL 15255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ember-communications-inc-v-bijoux-terner-inc-fladistctapp-1990.